If your Thick Skinned & like hard-nosed Sports and or Political conversation then this steel and barbed wire cage match type of forum is for you................

Click To Enter

Reward: $100,000 for Full ‘JournoList’ Archive; Source Fully Protected

(1/8) > >>

Dementia_Madness:
http://biggovernment.com/abreitbart/2010/06/29/reward-100000-for-full-journolist-archive-source-fully-protected/

Flummoxed Lummox:
 /Basilio/

Dementia_Madness:
Quote

The American people, at least half of whom are the objects of scorn of this group of 400, deserve to know who was colluding against them so that in the future they can better understand how the once-objective media has come to be so corrupted and despised.

Yep, 400 journalists' collusion against over half of the American peoples is indeed something to snooze at, meanwhile F  Lane L makes another thread about the "ignorant" "evil" "hate-filled" "Tea-baggers" or Palin..... might one say According To Our Resident socialist liberal atheist Malcontent This Is No Big Deal? One might.

Quote

The fact that 400 journalists did not recognize how wrong their collusion, however informal, was shows an enormous ethical blind spot toward the pretense of impartiality. As journalists actively participated in an online brainstorming session on how best to spin stories in favor of one party against another, they continued to cash their paychecks from their employers under the impression that they would report, not spin the agreed-upon “news” on behalf of their “JournoList” peers.

NCVol:
Librul media bias, dbm, msm, oh noes, it's sooo terrible to have all this bias.  

If folks would step back for a second, they'd see where the actual bias is.  Follow the money.  Who owns the media companies and who funds their operations through advertising.  When you figure that out, you'll see where the bias is and what subjects are covered and what's not covered in polite company.  The librul media crap is just insanely stupid or ignorant or naive or all three.  It's a bias towards who pays the bills and funds their paychecks and the money that funds all the national media outlets comes directly from the largest corporate interests who have a vested stake in the government that they've spent decades buying.  

I'm not sure what part of "Owned by billionaires and funded by billionaires" is hard to grasp.  They aren't as a whole "librul" they are self interested which is how they became billionaires personally or the companies came to dominate their space.  They didn't get there by protecting working people, that's for damn sure.  They got there rigging the game in their favor.  If that's "librul" then I guess the Fortune 500 is "librul."  

What's amazing about Breitbart is he's really without any principles at all.  If he'd read the WP the day Weigel got fired, the people who DESPISED him were right wingers, not liberals.  Every librul outlet that I read liked Weigel, thought he did a good job.  It was the The tea baggers who hated him because in recent days he'd criticized RP fans, aka "Paultards" and the really offensive quote was about Drudge.  So the group who purged him was the Breitbart crowd, but that liar turns it around and blames it on the biased libruls who were enforcing a certain orthodoxy.  

I can't believe I wasted three minutes reading words written by Breitbart or responding here.  The guy's a flake and an idiot and he should be ignored.  I'll try to do better to take my own advice.  

NCVol:
Quote from: Darth_Mondo on June 29, 2010, 01:55:17 PM

Yep, 400 journalists' collusion against over half of the American peoples is indeed something to snooze at, meanwhile F  Lane L makes another thread about the "ignorant" "evil" "hate-filled" "Tea-baggers" or Palin..... might one say According To Our Resident socialist liberal atheist Malcontent This Is No Big Deal? One might.



Does making a made up statement without any evidence at all to support it make that statement true.  Because if it does, there's a lot of statements I'd like to make.

"Yes, the collusion of the GOP with the Fortune 500 to push the U.S. into depression so they can round up the poor and put them into camps where they'll be killed is nothing to snooze at....."

Breitbart's job is making up shiate and passing it off as news or journalism.  He's a hack and an expert in inflaming other people.  Until you can provide any evidence about these 400 people on an email list conspiring against YOU why not talk about something that has a shred of support.

BTW, if Breitbart wants to talk about unethical collusion, maybe he'll mention the talking points that go out of each party every day to their stable of talking heads.  Isn't it amazing how the right wingers and the left all have the same points using the same words each day?  Gosh, is that not collusion.  Or the gatherings held in both the Bush and now Obama WH to news people who share their viewpoints.  Bush invited Rush, Boortz and others for special access. 

See, if Breitbart wasn't a lying hack, he'd point these out too, but he's a lying hack so he ignores the real institutional collusion in favor of something he can make up that sounds sinister, instead of focusing his audience on what IS actually a problem. 

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page