"The most economically incompetent administration since the Great Depression"

If your Thick Skinned & like hard-nosed Sports and or Political conversation then this steel and barbed wire cage match type of forum is for you................

Click To Enter

<< < (2/60) > >>

Sasquatch:
Quote from: NCVol on August 08, 2010, 10:39:56 AM

1) Nice touch to use the right wing "Democrat" instead of the proper term "Democratic." It's nice to see that kind of petty bullcrap in a national publications editorial page to give a clear signal the author is a hack.

It is nice to see other "right wing" media do the same......NCVol, you get more delusional each day....BTW, this is just a sampling. I didn't even try to do a search for "democrat-run", or "democrat-led"

/ROFLMAO/

A Democrat-controlled House wouldn't impeach, Pelosi says

http://articles.sfgate.com/2006-05-13/news/17295903_1_impeachment-house-democrats-resolution

http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/pelosi

Democrat-controlled Congress takes office on Thursday

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/01/03/bush/index.html

Illinois' Democrat-controlled General Assembly

The potential for the political fallout to reach Illinois has led the Democrat-controlled House

California's Democrat-controlled legislature

http://www.reuters.com/assets/print?aid=USTRE67548020100806

UPI Senior News Analyst
Washington (UPI) June 11, 2007
An op-ed last week in Space News provided significant support for our assessment that the new Democrat-controlled 110th Congress...

http://www.spacewar.com/reports/Democrats_For_Missile_Defense_999.html

The outspoken majority leader was unapologetic about the "progress, not success" that President Barack Obama and the Democrat-controlled Congress has made

http://www.aolnews.com/nation/article/top-democrat-regrets-calling-tea-party-protests-un-american/19450091

the new Democrat-controlled Congress

http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2006/12/unions_look_for.html

NCVol:
I apologize for pointing out the incorrect use of "democrat" instead of democratIC. I suppose the misuse of the term has now reached newspaper writers. The term, accompanied by a long string of bullcrap is a pretty good indication of the dishonest hackery that the article passes off as legitimate opinion.

But let's assume that "democrat-controlled" is somehow legitimate. I could be wrong. Now how about the substance? I see you didn't search or respond to any of that.

The fact is the IBD editorial page was given over to simply provably bogus analysis. It's a shame a national paper targeted to informed business leaders doesn't have enough respect for its readers to honestly address the economic crisis confronting us.

BTW, I'll add another ridiculous propaganda point.

Quote

$700 billion TARP program that became a giant dish of pork for Democrats and their supporters,

It's just historical FACT that TARP was passed at the insistence of Paulson, supported by the entire GOP leadership, and was signed by Bush. And TARP was just the next in a long line of Wall Street bailouts that had happened since the Spring of 2008 when the big boys started failing. What kind of dumbshiate shill now alleges the bill drafted by Paulson and the Bush White House "became" a dish of pork for democrats and their supporters? Are Obama, Reid and Pelosi so powerful that they were even able to get the Bush WH and economic team to favor democratic interests over the GOP interests. AMAZING! And it's even more amazing that the GOP top leadership in the Congress and WH, including Paulson and Bush, went along! WOW!!

Just Win:
Quote from: NCVol on August 08, 2010, 01:50:02 PM

I apologize for pointing out the incorrect use of "democrat" instead of democratIC. I suppose the misuse of the term has now reached newspaper writers. The term, accompanied by a long string of bullcrap is a pretty good indication of the dishonest hackery that the article passes off as legitimate opinion.

But let's assume that "democrat-controlled" is somehow legitimate. I could be wrong. Now how about the substance? I see you didn't search or respond to any of that.

The fact is the IBD editorial page was given over to simply provably bogus analysis. It's a shame a national paper targeted to informed business leaders doesn't have enough respect for its readers to honestly address the economic crisis confronting us.

BTW, I'll add another ridiculous propaganda point.

It's just historical FACT that TARP was passed at the insistence of Paulson, supported by the entire GOP leadership, and was signed by Bush. And TARP was just the next in a long line of Wall Street bailouts that had happened since the Spring of 2008 when the big boys started failing. What kind of dumbshiate shill now alleges the bill drafted by Paulson and the Bush White House "became" a dish of pork for democrats and their supporters? Are Obama, Reid and Pelosi so powerful that they were even able to get the Bush WH and economic team to favor democratic interests over the GOP interests. AMAZING! And it's even more amazing that the GOP top leadership in the Congress and WH, including Paulson and Bush, went along! WOW!!

I have three simple questions since you seem to have all the answers the current administration wants us to have. Please spare us the spin in your answers.

1. Where are the promised jobs that would be found in profusion if we passed the Obama/ Pelosi/ Reid China-enslavement debt Stimulus Jobs Bill? The job market has just gone south the last 18 months or so and we were told this was the "Summer of Recovery" yet unemployment contines to be widespread.

2. Why did Christina Romer, Chairwoman of the president's Council of Economic Advisers , resign the other day?

3. Why did Perter Orzog, Director of the Office of Management and Budget , resign the other day?

NCVol:
Quote from: Just Win on August 08, 2010, 04:19:01 PM

1. Where are the promised jobs that would be found in profusion if we passed the Obama/ Pelosi/ Reid China-enslavement debt Stimulus Jobs Bill? The job market has just gone south the last 18 months or so and we were told this was the "Summer of Recovery" yet unemployment contines to be widespread.

2. Why did Christina Romer, Chairwoman of the president's Council of Economic Advisers , resign the other day?

3. Why did Perter Orzog, Director of the Office of Management and Budget , resign the other day?

1) The jobs left with the production that has been offshored to China. I've only pointed out this simple fact about 100 times in 100 different ways, but you guys ignore those posts, preferring to blame the collapse in jobs that happened well before Obama took over - at a rate of 750,000 per MONTH in January 2009, to Obama policies that hadn't been enacted yet, including hundreds of $billions in TAX CUTS just like you all like.

Since we're asking questions, where were the jobs the entire DECADE, eight years of them presided over by Bush. There were NO JOBS CREATED FOR A DECADE. And the wages for the middle class, even before the Great Recession, were flat, not a dime in wage gains. So wha happened?!

2) Romer probably quit because by all accounts this rational person had her access cut to zero by Larry "Eight Million Man" Summers. She along with other "liberals" like Paul Volcker were cut out of the loop by everyone's favorite bought Wall Street whore, Larry. It's amazing how cheap you can buy a man, isn't it. Of course I've pointed THIS out to you guys about 100 times, too. Larry prefers policies that funnel billions to the CEO class, just like the Bush administration before him. As I've said.

3) I don't know why Orzag quit. He spent a typical amount of time in that thankless job.

native:
I thought from the heading, you were writing about the Bush Administration.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page